Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Optimal Designs and Comparison of the Doubly Salient Permanent Magnet Machine and F
Post: #1

Optimal Designs and Comparison of the Doubly
Salient Permanent Magnet Machine and
Flux-reversal Machine in Low-speed Applications

The subject of this is to optimize the design and to compare
The performances of a low-speed doubly salient permanent magnet machine with
Those of a low-speed flux-reversal machine devoted to direct drive applications. The
Optimization, focused on the maximization of the machines mass-to-torque ratio,
is done by a genetic algorithm combined with the finite-element method (FEM).
The electromagnetic characteristics of the two optimized machines, including phase
Flux linkage, inductances, back-electromotive forces (EMFs), and static torque, ob-
Tainted from FEM analysis, are then analyzed and compared. Finally, the torque
Cost and the torque density of the two machines are compared with those of other

1. Introduction

For direct-drive low-speed applications, several machine topologies to fulfill the requirement
Of specific applications have been investigated and proposed [1“6]. The design of
These machines can be tackled through different approaches, including axial flux, radial
Flux, and even transverse flux types. The direct-drive benefits stand in the elimination
Of the gear and related problems (efficiency, oil maintenance and pollution, positioning
In various works on machines called doubly salient permanent magnet (DSPM)
Machines and flux-reversal machines (FRMs), it has been shown that by introducing
Permanent magnets (PMs) in the doubly salient structure of variable reluctance machines
(VRMs), new machine geometries can be realized [7“17]. These topologies appear to
Improve machine performances in terms of torque production.
The dented switched reluctance machine (SRM) with a great number of teeth and
The low-speed PM FRM type, which are illustrated in and described
In this, can be regarded as new members of the DSPM and FRM families,
Respectively they are the subjects for investigation Both machines have
Doubly salient structure and employ concentrated stator windings. Their field excitations
Are provided by non-rotating PMs located in the stator, and there is no magnet or winding
In the dented rotor Four pieces of PM are inset in the stator yoke of the DSPM machine,
While in the FRM, 8 PM pieces are mounted on the surface of each of the 12 stator
Plots facing the air gap In both machines, the magnets are magnetized in alternative
Opposite directions The machines are characterized by the same slot pitch, both on rotor
And stator teeth and the rectangular current shape is investigated. The shape of the rotor
And the stator teeth retained here is trapezoidal [2], while the shape of the PM retained
for the FRM structure is rectangular.
deals with the electromagnetic design and the optimization of this low speed
Machines with rated power of 10 kW at 50 rpm for direct-drive applications A
Comparison of the performances of the two optimized machines is then conducted.
The electromagnetic design optimization of these machines is done by genetic
Algorithms (GAs) combined with the finite-element method (FEM). The objective is
To maximize the mass-to-torque ratio that represents an essential feature of direct-drive


The optimization applies on the small teeth parameters as well as the global parameters,
Such as rotor and stator yoke, slot and magnet width, coil height, rotor radius,
And so on. To allow a good comparison between the two designed machines, identical
Architectures (the shape of the main elements) and identical optimization constraints are
Considered for both machines.
The electromagnetic characteristics of the two optimized machines, including phase
Flux linkage, inductances, back-electromotive forces (EMFs), and static torques, obtained
From FEM analysis, are then analyzed and compared. Furthermore, the comparison of the
Designed machines with other direct-drive structures, such as the SRMand transverse flux,
Axial flux, and radial flux permanent magnet (RFPM) machines is conducted. The results
Obtained show that the DSPM machine and the FRM structures studied and optimized in convenient for direct-drive applications.

Important Note..!

If you are not satisfied with above reply ,..Please


So that we will collect data for you and will made reply to the request....OR try below "QUICK REPLY" box to add a reply to this page
Popular Searches: slip test on salient pole alternator theory, fem butch**ay news pepar matka, 1g 2g and 3g comparison ppt, analysis and comparison of 1g 2g 3g 4g and 5g pdf, salient features of linux os, comparison hydrogen and petrol, fem estro hp,

Quick Reply
Type your reply to this message here.

Image Verification
Image Verification
(case insensitive)
Please enter the text within the image on the left in to the text box below. This process is used to prevent automated posts.

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread: Author Replies: Views: Last Post
  The Adjustment of Product Fineness of Eccentric Powder Machine wanerjob 1 353 25-10-2014 08:51 PM
Last Post: jaseela123
  Coal Mining Machine from Shanghai Zenith wanerjob 0 252 27-09-2014 08:59 PM
Last Post: wanerjob
  BRAIN MACHINE INTERFACE seminar surveyer 1 1,189 08-06-2012 05:41 PM
Last Post: seminar details
  Automatic telephone answering machine summer project pal 1 1,858 09-02-2012 09:54 AM
Last Post: nilesh.vetale
  HAND GESTURE : FOR HUMAN MACHINE INTERACTION science projects buddy 3 4,947 23-08-2011 10:13 AM
Last Post: shreeyog
  AUTOMATIC EGG SHELL PEELING MACHINE smart paper boy 0 725 18-08-2011 10:28 AM
Last Post: smart paper boy
  The lowest price for sortex machine ,food processing machine Michael8674 0 1,120 13-04-2011 07:32 AM
Last Post: Michael8674
  BRAIN MACHINE INTERFACE seminar surveyer 1 1,184 31-03-2011 10:07 AM
Last Post: seminar class
  SUPER MACHINE USING HTS full presentation seminar class 0 938 25-02-2011 09:42 AM
Last Post: seminar class
Last Post: summer project pal